Computational And Review Exercises

Consider an investor having an initial wealth of 16 whose utility function for wealth w is w1'2. (a) Show that he is indifferent between the status quo and the following two gambles (i) lose 7 or gain 9 with equal probability, and (ii) lose 16 with probability 22 80, gain 48 with probability 1 8 and gain 9 with probability 3 5. (b) Will he prefer to accept one or more of these gambles if his initial wealth is 25 (c) Change the odds on these gambles so that he is indifferent between each of the...

General Theory Of Subjective Probabilities And Expected Utilities

Fishburn Research Analysis Corporation 1. Introduction. The purpose of this paper is to present a general theory for the usual subjective expected utility model for decision under uncertainty. With a set S of states of the world and a set X of consequences let F be a set of functions on S to X. F is the set of acts. Under a set of axioms based on extraneous measurement probabilities, a device that is used by Rubin 14 , Chernoff 3 , Luce and Raiffa 9, Ch. 13 , Anscombe and Aumann 1 ,...

Proportional Risk Aversion

So far we have been concerned with risks that remained fixed while assets varied. Let us now view everything as a proportion of assets. Specifically, let n*(x,z) be the proportional risk premium corresponding to a proportional risk 2 that is, a decision maker with assets x and utility function u would be indifferent between receiving a risk xz and receiving the non-random amount E(xz) xn*(x,z). Then xir*(x,z) equals the risk premium jr(x,xz), so For a small, actuarially neutral, proportional...

Preface And Brief Notes To The 2006 Edition

Over the years we have been pleased that Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance has stood the test of time in being a path breaking book concerned with optimizing models of financial problems that involve uncertainty. The book has been well known and respected for its excellent fundamental articles that are reprinted and the several new articles specifically written for the volume, as well as additionally for its large collection of computational and review, and mind expanding exercises. All...

V nf PJXi hf i

By Lemma 1, v 1 vi with v One has (1') v is a nonnegative linear functional. For 0 > 0 > v ( ) (2') v,(e 1, For 0 S v,(e) g e(x ) 1, and 1 v(e) * i A v,(e) Thus v is a probability measure on F. Furthermore, one has (3') V is a discrete probability measure, concentrated on Q. For if 2 0 is any continuous function which vanishes on Q x1,x2, , xk , then 0 1 , (*,) V( ) X plVl(f) > v,( ) 0, Ui . Define vf( jc-j ) xj , where Yi is the random variable corresponding to V . Then (2)...

UM mv221 WS

Is the expected value of following the policy 3 if the consumer has initial wealth w. The reader is asked in Exercise CR-19 to verify that the monotonicity assumption is satisfied by this return function if the u, are monotone nondecreasing. If w, is bounded, say, by m lt oo, then the return function is well defined because If one considers a finite planning period of, say, T periods, then the return function might be vs w E Yj_x , c, and the transition functions such that P z co, N, d 0 for...

Introduction

The first part of this book is devoted to technical prerequisites tor the study of stochastic optimization models. We have selected articles and included exercises that appear to provide the necessary background for the study of the specific financial models discussed in the remainder of the book. The treatment in this part is, however, necessarily brief because of space limitations hence the reader may wish to consult some of the noted additional references on some points. The prerequisites...

L

Now define 2.6 X fl l - xl X , 0 S X g 1. Hence 2.8 x 1 - xl x 0 lt X lt 1. 1 To see that x a 3 is pseudo-convex, note that Vxd x I 3x2 gt 0. Hence z - x 'V ix g 0 implies that x amp x and x3 i x0 3, and thus x - 0 x x x' - x x 3 0. We have from 2.4 through 2.7 that X achieves its maximum at X. Hence it follows by the differentiability of 6 x and the chain rule that 2.9 x2 - x' 'V, 0 x 0. 2.10 x1 - x x - 1 - X x - Xx2 1 - X x2 - x1 , it follows from 2.9 and 2.10 and the fact...

Static Portfolio Selection Models

Mean-Variance and Safety First Approaches and Their Extensions 215 The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments The Review of Economic Studies 37, 537-542 1970 215 The Asymptotic Validity of Quadratic Utility as the Trading Interval Approaches Zero Safety-First and Expected Utility Maximization in Mean-Standard Deviation Portfolio Analysis David H. Pyle and Stephen J. Turnovsky The Review of Economics and Statistics 52, 75-81...